From our Garland Reporter:
വെളുക്കാന്‍ തേച്ചത് പാണ്ടായതുപോലെയായി ഗാര്‍ലണ്ടില്‍ കാര്യങ്ങള്‍.Crucifix നെ support ചെയ്തിരുന്ന മൂന്നു പള്ളി കമ്മിറ്റിക്കാരെ പിരിച്ചുവിട്ടു ക്ലാവര്‍ വാദികള്‍ മാത്രമായുള്ള ഒരു പള്ളികമ്മിറ്റിയുണ്ടാക്കുവാനുള്ള ജോജിയച്ചന്‍റെ ശ്രമങ്ങള്‍ക്ക് ശക്തമായ തിരിച്ചടി. പിരിച്ചുവിടുവാന്‍ നോട്ടീസ് കിട്ടിയ മൂന്നു കമ്മിറ്റിക്കാരും അച്ഛന്‍റെ നോട്ടീസിനെ കോടതിയില്‍ ചോദ്യം ചെയ്യാന്‍ തീരുമാനിച്ചതിനെ തുടര്‍ന്ന് അച്ഛനും മറ്റു ക്ലാവര്‍ വാദികളും എന്ത് ചെയ്യണമെന്നറിയാതെ കുഴങ്ങുകയാണ്. ജനാധിപത്യപരമായി തിരഞ്ഞെടുക്കപ്പെട്ട ഈ മൂന്നു കമ്മിറ്റിക്കാരുടെ കൂടെ അതാതു വാര്‍ഡുകളിലെ ഭൂരിപക്ഷം ജനങ്ങളും അച്ചനെതിരെയും ക്ലാവരിനെതിരെയും തിരിഞ്ഞു എന്നതും ക്ലാവരുകാര്‍ക്ക് കിട്ടിയ ഇരുട്ടടിപോലെയായി. കുടുക്കുകള്‍ അഴിക്കാന്‍ ശ്രമിക്കുമ്പോള്‍ കൂടുതല്‍ കുടുക്കുകളിലേക്ക് അച്ഛനും ക്ലാവര്‍ വാദികളും വീണുപോകുന്നത് ജനങ്ങള്‍ സസൂഷ്മം വീക്ഷിക്കുകയാണ്. പൊതുയോഗമെടുത്ത നല്ലൊരു തീരുമാനത്തെ കാറ്റില്‍ പറത്തി സ്വന്തം തീരുമാനങ്ങള്‍ ജനങ്ങളില്‍ അടിച്ചേല്‍പ്പിക്കാന്‍ ശ്രമിച്ച അങ്ങാടിക്കും ജോജിക്കും ദൈവം കൊടുത്ത തിരിച്ചടികള്‍ മനസ്സിലാക്കാന്‍ പോലും ഇവര്‍ക്ക് സാധിക്കുന്നില്ലല്ലോ? ദൈവഹിതത്തിനെതിരായി പള്ളിയുടെ ഡിസൈന്‍ ചെയ്യിപ്പിച്ച ക്ലാവര്‍ വാദികളും ഇന്ന് എന്ത് ചെയ്യണമെന്നറിയാതെ കുഴങ്ങുകയാണ്. ഈ വൈകിയ വേളയിലെങ്കിലും അച്ഛന്‍ ദൈവഹിതം നിറവേറ്റാന്‍ ചെയ്തുകൂട്ടിയ എല്ലാ തിനമകളെയുമോര്‍ത്ത് പശ്ത്താപിച്ചു തിരികെവരികെയാണ് വേണ്ടത്. എല്ലാ പ്രശ്നങ്ങള്‍ക്കും അത് മാത്രമേ ഒരു പരിഹാരം ഉള്ളൂ. നല്ലൊരു രീതിയില്‍ നടന്നുകൊണ്ടിരുന്ന ഒരു ഇടവകയെ ഈ രീതിയില്‍ ആക്കിയതിന് ജോജിയച്ചനുള്ള പങ്കു എന്നും കാലം ഓര്‍ത്തുവെക്കും എന്നതിന് സംശയമില്ല. രണ്ടാള്‍ കൂടി തുടങ്ങിവെച്ച ഗാര്‍ലന്‍ഡിലെ കുരിശുയുദ്ധത്തില്‍ ഇന്ന് ആ ഇടവകയിലെ 90 % ആളുകളും ചേര്‍ന്നത്‌ ദൈവത്തിന്‍റെ ഇഷ്ടമില്ലാതെയാണോ എന്ന് ജോജിയച്ചനും കൂട്ടരും ചിന്തിച്ചാല്‍ നല്ലത്. ദൈവത്തിന്‍റെ പ്രതിപുരുഷനെന്ന്‍ അവകാശപ്പെടുന്ന ജോജിയച്ചന്‍ ജനങ്ങളെ തമ്മില്‍ തല്ലിച്ചതിനും ചിക്കാഗോയില്‍ ആന്റണി അച്ഛന്‍റെ കാലുവാരി ശീലയും ക്ലാവരും വെച്ചതിനും പാവം സജിയച്ചനെ ഇവിടുന്നു ഓടിച്ചതിനും ഈ ഗാര്‍ലണ്ടില്‍ നിന്ന് തന്നെ അനുഭവിച്ചേ മതിയാകൂ. കാലം അത് തെളിയിച്ചു തരും. കാത്തിരുന്നു കാണുക.
11 comments:
Fantastic.This more interseting than Kerala Assembly Elections.I consider Clavar gang as CPM and Crucifix gand as Congress.Interseting to watch and read.Who'll winn at the end?Lets wait and watch.
there is no clavar gang.it is created by angadi
Crosss,crucifix and curtain
Did any of us made any opinion about any structure,when we build a church in kerala?
Here who gave the power to public to make opinion on structures when we make a church building?
Authorities build with our money .we simply accept it.
stop unhealthy comments. bishop and vicar will do only for our good future.
why we don't need a curtain? no reason.The excuse they tel us is the third class Pentecostal excuse. when Jesus died curtain split apart,so we don't need curtain any more.Hippocrates, when Jesus died their are so many things happened (read Mathew 27:27-52),for eg.45 From the sixth hour there was darkness over all the land until the ninth hour.(would you say we don't need light,because light became dark when Jesus died)51 And suddenly, the veil of the Sanctuary was torn in two from top to bottom (canot use curtain because veil torn)
, the earth quaked,(canot own land or don't need this earth,because earth quaked when jesus died.)
the rocks were split,(so can't use any kind of rock,because rock split when jesus died.)
52 the tombs opened,( so we can't bury anybody because tombs opened when jesus died.
the bodies of many holy people rose from the dead,( so people can't dieanymore because dead rose when jesus died.)
what a stupid logic is that?
If we need a crucifix,what kind of jesus we need a white,black,Mongolian or Indian Jesus.
Orgin of cross
The word used in Greek in original manuscripts is "stauros"
it means upright wooden stake or pole. It never mean a T shaped thing.
A tradition of the Church which our fathers have inherited, was the adoption of the words "cross" and "crucify." These words are nowhere to be found in the Greek of the New Testament. These words are mistranslations, a "later rendering," of the Greek words stauros and stauroo. Vine's Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words says, "STAUROS denotes, primarily, an upright pole or stake...Both the noun and the verb stauroo, to fasten to a stake or pole, are originally to be distinguished from the ecclesiastical form of a two-beamed cross. The shape of the latter had its origin in ancient Chaldea (Babylon), and was used as the symbol of the god Tammuz (being in the shape of the mystic Tau, the initial of his name)...By the middle of the 3rd century A.D. the churches had either departed from, certain doctrines of the Christian faith. In order to increase the pretige of the apostate ecclesiastical system pagans were received into the churches apart from regeneration by faith, and were permitted largely to retain their pagan signs and symbols. Hence the Tau or T, in its most frequent form, with the cross piece lowered, was adopted..." [1]
Dr. Bullinger, The Companion Bible, appx. 162 states, "crosses were used as symbols of the Babylonian Sun-god...It should be stated that Constantine was a Sun-god worshipper...The evidence is thus complete , that the Lord was put to death upon and upright stake, and not on two pieces of timber placed at any angle." [2]
Rev. Alexander Hislop, The Two Babylons, pp. 197-205, frankly calls the cross "this Pagan symbol...the Tau, the sign of the cross, the indisputable sign of Tammuz, the false Messiah...the mystic Tau of the Chaldeans (Babylonians) and Egyptians--the true original form of the letter T--the initial of the name of Tammus...the Babylonian cross was the recognized emblem of Tammuz." [3]
In the Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th edition, vol. 14, p. 273, we read, "In the Egyptian churches the cross was a pagan symbol of life borrowed by the Christians and interpreted in the pagan manner." Jacob Grimm, in his Deutsche Mythologie, says that the Teutonic (Germanic) tribes had their idol Thor, symbolised by a hammer, while the Roman Christians had their crux (cross). It was thus somewhat easier for the Teutons to accept the Roman cross. [4]
Greek dictionaries, lexicons and other study books also declare the primary meaning of stauros to be an upright pale, pole or stake. The secondary meaning of "cross" is admitted by them to be a "later" rendering. At least two of them do not even mention "cross," and only render the meaning as "pole or stake." In spite of this strong evidence and proof that the word stauos should have been translated "stake," and the verb stauroo to have been translated "impale," almost all the common versions of the Scriptures persist with the Latin Vulgate's crux (cross), a "later" rendering of the Greek stauros. [5]
more....
http://www.thewordsofeternallife.com/cross.html
How jesus use the word cross.
every time Jesus use the word cross means sufferings nothing but sufferings
if you have any doubts look all passages Jesus use cross in bible
Matthew 10:38
And he that doth not take his cross and follow after me, is not worthy of me.
Matthew 16:24
. Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man would come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.
Matthew 27:32
And as they came out, they found a man of Cyrene, Simon by name: him they compelled to go [with them], that he might bear his cross.
Mark 8:34
And he called unto him the multitude with his disciples, and said unto them, If any man would come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.
Luke 9:23
And he said unto all, If any man would come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me.
Luke 14:27
Whosoever doth not bear his own cross, and come after me, cannot be my disciple.
1 Cor 1:17
. For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not in wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made void.
1 Cor 1:18
For the word of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us who are saved it is the power of God.
What is cross to jesus
How jesus use the word cross.
Every time Jesus use the word cross means sufferings nothing but sufferings
if you have any doubts look all passages Jesus use cross in bible
Matthew 10:38 And he that doth not take his
cross and follow after me, is not worthy of me.
Matthew 16:24 . Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man would come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his
cross, and follow me.
Matthew 27:32 And as they came out, they found a man of Cyrene, Simon by name: him they compelled to go [with them], that he might bear his
cross.
Mark 8:34 And he called unto him the multitude with his disciples, and said unto them, If any man would come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his
cross, and follow me.
Luke 9:23 And he said unto all, If any man would come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his
cross daily, and follow me.
Luke 14:27 Whosoever doth not bear his own
cross, and come after me, cannot be my disciple.
1 Cor 1:17 . For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not in wisdom of words, lest the
cross of Christ should be made void.
1 Cor 1:18 For the word of the
cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us who are saved it is the power of God.
Orgin of cross
The word used in original greek manuscripts is "stauros"
it means upright wooden stake or pole. It never mean a T shaped thing.
A tradition of the Church which our fathers have inherited, was the adoption of the words "cross" and "crucify." These words are nowhere to be found in the Greek of the New Testament. These words are mistranslations, a "later rendering," of the Greek words stauros and stauroo. Vine's Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words says, "STAUROS denotes, primarily, an upright pole or stake...Both the noun and the verb stauroo, to fasten to a stake or pole, are originally to be distinguished from the ecclesiastical form of a two-beamed cross. The shape of the latter had its origin in ancient Chaldea (Babylon), and was used as the symbol of the god Tammuz (being in the shape of the mystic Tau, the initial of his name)...By the middle of the 3rd century A.D. the churches had either departed from, certain doctrines of the Christian faith. In order to increase the pretige of the apostate ecclesiastical system pagans were received into the churches apart from regeneration by faith, and were permitted largely to retain their pagan signs and symbols. Hence the Tau or T, in its most frequent form, with the cross piece lowered, was adopted..." [1]Dr. Bullinger, The Companion Bible, appx. 162 states, "crosses were used as symbols of the Babylonian Sun-god...It should be stated that Constantine was a Sun-god worshipper...The evidence is thus complete , that the Lord was put to death upon and upright stake, and not on two pieces of timber placed at any angle." [2]Rev. Alexander Hislop, The Two Babylons, pp. 197-205, frankly calls the cross "this Pagan symbol...the Tau, the sign of the cross, the indisputable sign of Tammuz, the false Messiah...the mystic Tau of the Chaldeans (Babylonians) and Egyptians--the true original form of the letter T--the initial of the name of Tammus...the Babylonian cross was the recognized emblem of Tammuz." [3]In the Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th edition, vol. 14, p. 273, we read, "In the Egyptian churches the cross was a pagan symbol of life borrowed by the Christians and interpreted in the pagan manner." Jacob Grimm, in his Deutsche Mythologie, says that the Teutonic (Germanic) tribes had their idol Thor, symbolised by a hammer, while the Roman Christians had their crux (cross). It was thus somewhat easier for the Teutons to accept the Roman cross. [4]Greek dictionaries, lexicons and other study books also declare the primary meaning of stauros to be an upright pale, pole or stake. The secondary meaning of "cross" is admitted by them to be a "later" rendering. At least two of them do not even mention "cross," and only render the meaning as "pole or stake." In spite of this strong evidence and proof that the word stauos should have been translated "stake," and the verb stauroo to have been translated "impale," almost all the common versions of the Scriptures persist with the Latin Vulgate's crux (cross), a "later" rendering of the Greek stauros.
Who is this idiotic moron?
"ഗാര്‍ലണ്ടില്‍ ജോജിയച്ചന്‍ ഊരാക്കുടുക്കിലേക്ക്"
നീ അമേരിക്കയിലേക്ക് വന്നപ്പോള്‍, നിന്‍റെ തന്തേ മാറ്റി, നിന്‍റെ ഒറിജിനല്‍ തന്തേ മാറ്റി, കറബനയോ മെക്സിക്കയോ ആക്കിയോ?
ഇതാണ് പല തന്തക്ക് പിറന്നാലുളള കുഴപ്പം!
ഇനിയേങ്കിലും നിന്‍റെ തന്ത ആരാണ് എന്ന് മനസിലാക്കട പൊട്ടനായ മണ്ടാ!
താഴേ എഴുതിവനുളള മറുപടി {May 19, 2011 8:41 AM}
If we need a crucifix,what kind of jesus we need a white,black,Mongolian or Indian Jesus.
May 19, 2011 8:41 AM
മുകളിലേഴുതിയവനേ ഏറ്റവും നല്ലത് ഈ ചോദൃത്തിന് ഉത്തരം! നീ തന്നേയല്ലേടാ നല്ലത്. അതിന്‍റെ ഇടത്തുവശത്തായി അങ്ങാടിയേയും പവ്വത്തിനേയും തറക്കാണെങ്കില്‍ ഏറ്റവും നല്ലത്! മനസിലായോട കഴതേ!
we need a crucifix, IF WE ARE CATHOLICS.
if you are ashamed of crucifix join protestant group man
get lost protestant kaldaaya
REPLY TO THE IDIOT WHO COMMENTED JUST BEFORE THIS COMMENT.
IF YOU ARE RICH ENOUGH PLEASE BUILD A CHURCH OF YOUR OWN AND YOU DECIDE HOW IT SHOULD LOOK LIKE. WHEN THE MAJORITY OF S.M.CATHOLICS DEMAND CERTAIN THINGS TO PROTECT AND PRESERVE THEIR FAITH ,
THE VICAR AND THE BISHOP SHOULD HEED TO THE LEGITIMATE CONCERNS OF THE ITS FAITHFUL. IF YOU ARE A FOLLOWER OF A FEW PAGAN BISHOPS IN KERALA LET THEM DO WHATEVER THEY WANT TO DO IN THEIR RESPECTIVE DIOCESES. WE FOLLOW THE GUIDE LINES OF OUR LATE. MAJOR ARCHBISHOP AND RESPECT THE DECISIONS OF S.M.SYNOD. WHY CAN'T YOU WRITE IN MALAYALAM IF YOU CANNOT WRITE FORMAL ENGLISH.? AT LEAST USE A DICTIONARY AND CHECK THE SPELLING.MAY BE YOU CAN CONSULT WITH ANGADI AND LUCIFER POWATHIL BEFORE YOU WRITE. DEAR FRIEND YOUR COMMENT SIMPLY DIDN'T MAKE SENSE. FR. SAJI WAS A NICE PRIEST AND WHY ANGADI CRUCIFIED HIM ON GOOD FRIDAY? HE WAS THE VICAR OF COPPEL CHURCH.
Post a Comment